Showing posts with label Olympia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Olympia. Show all posts

Monday, April 17, 2017

East Bay redevelopment cleanup open house April 25th

You are invited to an Open House and Public Meeting to discuss the cleanup at East Bay Redevelopment Cleanup Site.
When:   April 25, 2017
Time:    6:30 - 8:30 pm
Where: Olympia Center, Room A
              222 Columbia St NW, Olympia
Meeting Agenda:
6:30 - 7:00 PM Open House
7:00 - 8:00 PM Presentation and Q/A Session
8:00 - 8:30 PM Open House

Ecology staff members will be available for one-on-one discussion and to answer your questions. Light refreshments will be provided.


In addition to the meeting we invite you to submit written comments on several cleanup documents. 

  • Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study report   This report outlines the nature and extent of contamination and examines cleanup options.
  • Draft Cleanup Action Plan  This describes the proposed final cleanup actions.
  • Agreed Order  A legal agreement with the owners of the land to do the cleanup.
  • SEPA Determination  This describes the potential impacts of the project on the surrounding environment. Ecology reviewed the checklist and determined that the action was not likely to have significant negative impacts (a Determination of Non-Significance).
For more information visit the East Bay Redevelopment Cleanup website
 
You can review the cleanup documents at these locations:
  • Olympia Timberland Library, 313 8th Avenue SE, Olympia, WA 98501 Phone: (360) 352-0595
  • Ecology’s Southwest Regional Office Toxics Cleanup Program- 300 Desmond Drive SE, Lacey, WA. Please call (360)407-6365 for an appointment or email PublicDisclosureSWRO@ecy.wa.gov
Submit written comments to:
Steve Teel, Site Manager
Phone: (360) 407-6247
Email Steve.Teel@ecy.wa.gov
 
Questions about the meeting contact:
Stacy Galleher, Public Involvement Coordinator
Phone: (360) 407-6255
Email: Stacy.Galleher@ecy.wa.gov


Friday, March 20, 2015

Let’s Talk Science! Bugs and baby fish help scientists pinpoint stream pollution

By Jessica Payne, Environmental Assessment Program communications manager


Ecology scientists place trout eggs in Indian Creek
to test stream health. Photo by: Ecology
Here at Ecology, our scientists study the environment in a number of ways. Sometimes we're looking large scale and trying to investigate the big issues that might harm humans, animals or the environment. Other times, we're knee-deep in your own backyard stream trying to track down sources of pollution.

Scientists from our Environmental Assessment Program recently worked on a project just like that. They wanted to find out where pollution might be entering Indian Creek in Olympia. To answer this question, they focused on the stream's ability to support baby fish and the food they need to survive and grow. They tested for toxins in the stream water with baby trout.

For the study, they placed trout eggs into the creek at different test sites and waited to see how they did in the water. If the water is healthy, the fish should thrive. If it’s polluted with toxins, the fish will be affected.

Bugs and baby fish

A standard way of testing water quality is by running a chemical analysis through an instrument at a laboratory. However, many toxins can’t be detected by chemical analysis. We don’t have the ability
to test for everything that’s out there, and even for those that we can, there’s limited information available to tell us how those chemicals will affect aquatic life. What’s more, chemicals can have a very different effect on wildlife when they’re combined than when they stand alone.

“Sometimes, biology is the best way to test the waters.” said Brandee Era-Miller, our scientist running samples on the creek. “Why? Animals will respond to any toxin or combination of toxins. We don’t always have to know what’s in the water to see that it’s not good for fish.”

Aside from fish, our scientists also tested soils, aquatic stream bugs, periphyton (the green slime on rocks), and groundwater that was entering the stream.

Where, what and how did we test?

We first monitored the stream in 2010. From that study, we knew there was a stormwater pipe carrying runoff from nearby parking lots that may be adding pollutants to the stream. We tested both upstream and downstream from that suspected source to verify if it was indeed a source of toxins.

We looked to see if the fish could thrive in the stream. This means more than just surviving; we also checked to see if they failed to hatch from their eggs, if they had birth defects or stunted growth.
Fish are sensitive to different pollutants in each early stage of their life.

Those life stages include:

  • Eggs
  • Alevin stage - when they look like a fish but the egg is still attached
  • Fry - fully formed, but tiny, baby fish

Our results

What did we find out from this research? Two main things. First, we learned that the test itself was successful; that trout early lifestage testing can be done in streams to directly assess environmental conditions.

Second, results from the tests showed that the creek was a healthy habitat for fish at the upper site, but impaired at the lower one. What does this mean? Baby fish were more likely to survive and grow into healthy fry at the site upstream from the stormwater pipe than the one downstream.

Why this research matters

Not only did we use this method of research to identify sources of pollution for Indian Creek, we also tested a system that is accessible and affordable for all communities. This biological test is an easy and fairly affordable method that local cities, counties and even volunteers could use to test the health of their streams.

Running chemical analysis for every known toxicant in the stream is very expensive; this gives communities a way to find out how healthy their streams are without that cost.

Want read details of the study? 
You can find them on our Environmental Assessment Program report summary webpage.
You can also read a detailed review in the city of Olympia’s STREAM TEAM spring newsletter.

How you can protect your streams

It’s important for people to know the health of the streams in their neighborhood. It’s even more important for them to know how to protect those streams from toxic chemicals and contaminated stormwater runoff.

You can start by learning what stormwater is online and taking our stormwater quiz.

Every small action makes a difference. Learn what you can do to protect your water on our Washington Waters webpages and at Puget Sound Starts Here.


More about the Environmental Assessment Program

Ecology houses a department of scientists that work to measure and assess environmental conditions in Washington. We work hard to understand the state's land, air and water to keep everyone healthier. To learn more about us and the type of research we do, please visit the Environmental Assessment Program webpage.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Protecting air, land, water ... and saving lives!

By Erika Holmes, communications manager, Lacey

Ecology sets the bar high for state agency blood drives. So much so that the Puget Sound Blood Center recognized our employees' contributions with the following note of gratitude:
"Each year, the Department of Ecology holds more blood drives than any other donor group, and their blood drives consistently achieve or exceed their registration goal. In 2013, Ecology held 12 blood drives -- 173 different donors collectively gave 408 pints of blood.

This group's most recent amazing accomplishment was having 59 donors come to their two-day blood drive held the Thursday and Friday before Christmas. Because each pint of blood is divided into three usable components, in 2013, 1,224 patients in our community received blood that was donated at the Department of Ecology. And this group has been consistently excellent for decades.

Since April of 1994, the Department of Ecology has held 149 blood drives with 6,456 registrations. That's an average of 43 donors per drive. There are 303 past donors at the Department of Ecology, and more than half of them, 164 to be exact, are members of the prestigious Gallon Club; 7 more will receive their gallon pin at their next donation. Every great group needs a great coordinator. Allen Robbins has been overseeing the Ecology blood drives and has done an extraordinary job." -- Tori Fairhurst, Donor Representative, Puget Sound Blood Center
Ecology's ample donations were recognized with a handmade glass bowl by artist Ginger Kelly at the Puget Sound Blood Center's 2014 Partners in Life awards ceremony. Allen Robbins, who's been coordinating blood drives at Ecology's Lacey office since 1994, accepted the award. He also organized another drive earlier this week!

For more photos of the 2014 Partners in Life awards ceremony in Olympia, view Puget Sound Blood Center's Flickr album.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Ecology weighs Olympia isthmus height proposal

By Gordon White, Program Manager, Ecology Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program

“Right on!!!” and “Good job, D.O.E” were two reader comments generated by The Olympian’s July 5, 2009, story, Taller building plan hits snag. As great as the applause feels – and in government praise is rare - it’s also undeserved.

Here’s the deal. There is a big debate in the Capitol City over allowing taller buildings in a four-acre area along the isthmus shoreline that bridges the downtown with the west side. Debate includes a clash of values: supporting infill in urban growth areas versus keeping building heights low to protect public access, residential and historic views of the shoreline.

These are local issues and typically are decided locally. But part of the proposed area to be rezoned falls under the State Shoreline Management Act. To allow taller buildings, the city has to make sure the change is consistent with its shoreline program. Under the voter-approved Act, Ecology must review the city’s shoreline program amendment process, then evaluate the impact of changes.

This is where the Olympian’s news coverage may have led some people to give credit where credit isn’t due. The article has been read by some that Ecology’s involvement includes an opinion on the proposed Larida Passage project.

As boring and bureaucratic as it sounds, our review is about the city’s process to change its shoreline program – not the underlying project.

To be clear, Ecology usually isn’t in the business of deciding the merits of development or local zoning changes. We shouldn’t and won’t be. Unless there are clear mis-steps, omissions or violations of state law in a city or county shoreline decision, Ecology sticks to its role of providing science and technical support to the primary decision makers—local government.

Deciding one project at a time where the best places are along the city’s shorelines for taller buildings and where they should be avoided is a problem. Backing into the answers to these questions the way the city proposes, likely violates the Shoreline Management Acts principle against uncoordinated and piecemeal development.

We think the city should do a full analysis of all its shorelines and then make height decisions that make sense given all the varying geography and appropriate uses. This is what we advised the city to do a year ago.

After all, Ecology provided funding to the City in September 2007 so the city could do a comprehensive update of its shoreline program. To do anything else would be supporting what we’re required to protect against – piecemeal and uncoordinated shoreline development.

We’ve offered the city a chance to prove us wrong. See our June 10 letter to the city and initial analysis of the city’s “limited” shoreline amendment (Outline of Ecology’s pending decision, Limited amendment analysis).

Ecology’s decision has yet to be finalized. And when it’s made, then we’ll be ready to take the heat or the praise.