Showing posts with label riparian restoration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label riparian restoration. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Cleaning Up: How dredging is cleaning up Ridgefield’s Lake River

By Joyce Mercuri, Diana Smith, and Craig Rankine, Toxics Cleanup Program

How do you remove toxics from a sensitive environment, including a national wildlife refuge? This year, Ecology and the Port of Ridgefield have been using advanced cleanup techniques to remove pollution at the Pacific WoodTreating (PWT) cleanup site.

Recently, work shifted from Carty Lake to Lake River. The Carty Lake cleanup was finished in late October (learn more here and below). Meanwhile, the port’s contractor started cleaning up Lake River sediments in late October.

PWT’s operations polluted Lake River sediments near the port property with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), cresols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Dioxin is the main contaminant of concern.

Removing these contaminated sediments from the river is the most effective way to reduce risk to human health and improve the environment for fish and animals that eat fish. However, ensuring that dredging doesn’t harm water quality or spread contamination is tricky. The port and Ecology are working hard to ensure dredging protects the surrounding environment.
 
Lake River dredge area

Designing “precision” dredging

The port, under Ecology’s oversight, chose precise dredging technologies. Precise methods help minimize sediment disturbance and keep contamination from spreading or affecting water quality.

Careful planning was used to select the dredge area up front, which saves time and money during construction. The dredge area was identified by extensively sampling the river bottom to find out how widespread and deep contamination is.

Engineers then used computer mapping and statistical methods to plan the exact outline and depth of the area to be dredged. The dredge area is shown in green and dark blue on the map. The light blue area outside of the dredge area is less contaminated and will be covered with one foot of clean sand.

Then, project engineers used very high resolution underwater sonar surveying to make a detailed map of the river bottom in the dredge area. From this, they created a grid map showing where each dredge bucket would be placed and how deep it needs to go to get the contamination out. After dredging, sonar surveying is done again to make sure dredging goes to the planned depth.


Grid map showing dredge bucket areas (tiny squares)

Preparing to dredge

Removing pilings with a vibratory extractor
Once workers got to the site they removed old pilings and other debris that could get in the way of dredging equipment. Debris can keep the dredge bucket from closing, which can let contaminated sediments leak out. Debris can also make the dredge bucket disturb and spread contaminated sediments.

In October, the port’s contractor pulled out 121 wood pilings, some logs, and about 180 tons of concrete, asphalt, and debris.

Dredging the right sediments

This dredging equipment is designed to avoid releasing or spreading contaminated sediments. During dredging:
  1. A large excavator with a specialized clamshell bucket is placed onto a barge that is anchored over the dredge area. Rather than using a bucket dangling at the end of a cable, the clamshell bucket is attached to a fixed arm so the operator can precisely place the bucket. 
  2. An equipment operator carefully places the open bucket on the area to be dredged.
  3. Then, the two halves of the bucket slowly close and seal. This prevents sediments from leaking out while the bucket containing water and sediment is brought to the surface.
  4. The first pass over the area collects most of the contaminated sediments.
  5. The equipment goes over the area a second time to remove any loose sediment that the first pass could have disturbed. The operator also makes sure they reached the design depth for that 
    area.
Empty bucket being lowered into Lake River and closed bucket coming out with contaminated sediments
Computer software for dredging and high resolution global positioning system (GPS) devices attached to dredging equipment help ensure precision dredging. With these tools, the dredge operator can essentially see underwater to ensure each scoop of the bucket removes sediments from the right area and at the right depth. Engineers oversee this in real time.
Operator in excavator over Lake River using software to make sure he's placed the bucket correctly

Disposing of contaminated sediments

The bucket collects water along with sediments. The operator carefully releases this water into a bin on the dredging barge. Since it might be contaminated, this water is pumped to a treatment system on the port property. The operator also places the sediments into a barge that has been sealed to prevent sediments or water leaking back to the river. Watch a video
Releasing water to container, then releasing sediments to another container on the barge
Once the barge is full, it is towed to the end of Division Street near the sediment handling and water treatment area. Excavators load the sediments from the barge into dump trucks and they are taken into a covered handling area. In order to be dry enough to be accepted at the landfill, some cement needs to be added to the sediments. Once they are dry enough, the contractor loads them into trucks and takes them to the nearby landfills.
Unloading sediments from the barge, then transferring dried sediments out of the handling area

Restoring the area and finishing Lake River cleanup

The port is almost finished with dredging contaminated sediments from Lake River. The port has started placing clean sand over dredged areas and areas that contain lower levels of contamination (see light blue areas on the map above). They’ve also started placing “fish mix” sized rocks to stabilize and restore the shoreline.
Crane operator grabbing sand for the riverbed and equipment placing fish mix rocks on shoreline
To finish this part of the cleanup, the port will finish the dredging, as well as stabilizing and restoring the shoreline. They will also plant native plants and trees along the embankment. This work will continue through early spring 2015.

The port is doing the current cleanup under a 2013 legal agreement with Ecology. Ecology and the port are funding the cleanup.

Finishing the Carty Lake cleanup
Carty Lake plant restoration

The port used a different technique to clean up contaminated sediments in Carty Lake. You can read about that here. Now, native grasses planted along the Carty Lake shoreline have started to sprout. Landscape crews also planted wetland plants. They will finish planting the banks in the spring.

Questions?

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Landowner attention key to restoration success

By Jani Gilbert, communication manager, Eastern Regional Office





Replanting damaged riparian areas on our shorelines is not always successful. Sometimes these projects are only partially successful. It all depends on whether the landowners, who host the project, care enough to take care of the burgeoning trees and shrubs that do so much to protect our water quality.

This is the kind of landowner who saw to it that a riparian restoration project along their shoreline, four miles south of Ione on the east shore of the Pend Oreille River, was not just successful, but nearly 100 percent successful.

Grant supports successful restoration

Matt and Susan Hobbs used a $6,500 grant from the Washington Department of Ecology to restore their shoreline where approximately 160 feet of river bank erosion had destroyed the viability of the shoreline environment.

The Hobbs’ restored the shoreline without using rock or sloping – only planting. With the help of the (former) Pend Oreille Conservation District, consultant Sandie Durrand, and Jon Jones of Ecology’s Water Quality Program in Spokane, the river bank is well on its way to full restoration.

“Probably the most outstanding thing about this project is that there is near 100 percent survival of the plantings due to the diligence of the Hobbs,” said Jones. “The project was a success because of the landowners’ watering, weeding, and general hard work. Some of our projects fail because there isn’t buy-in by the owners. This one succeeded because the owners wanted it to work.”

“To improve the odds on the ground, we’ve followed-up the plantings with the best weeding and watering we can manage,” said Susan Hobbs. “Frankly, as a grant recipient, we consider it our duty.”

They had help from Sandie Durand of Cascara Consulting in Ione, Wash., who designed and planted the project and was right down on her knees with the Hobbs’ weeding and trimming the plants.

River stewards make the difference

“I care a lot about my work,” Durand said. “This river matters to me. Susan and I did the weeding and trying to keep down the canarygrass. And it was not an easy site to water. We used watering cans and a hose.”

As Durand explains, the site suffered as a result of a 1996-1997 high water event. When the water returned to normal, much of the shoreline had slumped into the river taking with it the natural vegetation and canopy that protected the river.

After that, a large section of the shoreline became dominated by reed canarygrass, along with other assorted, introduced noxious weeds and grasses.

“Reed canarygrass is an aggressive, introduced species of grass that becomes very deeply engrained,” Durand said. “Once it becomes established, it’s very difficult to eradicate it. We needed to remove the sod down several inches.”

Durand planted more than 600 plants, and 25 species, on the site and plans to plant more black cottonwood and local stock douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii). Eventually the canopy will shade out any remaining canarygrass.

“This may be the only project in this river system done with this diversity of species,” said Durand. “A lot of the success is due to choosing the correct plants and planting them correctly, but that landowner participation is the key.”

By the way, 100 percent success is a bit of an overstatement, but not much! Six plants died out of more than 600. (The culprit may have been a vole but it was more likely a variety of factors.)

Learn more about caring for our living shorelines.